Establishment continues to demonise British unemployed even as huge number of immigrants on benefits is revealed

Mexicans who believe a myth that some parts of the USA belong to Mexico; what's to stop an equivalent in the UK?

Last week the Coalition Government released figures that showed that over a quarter of a million immigrants were claiming benefits. The data generated an opportunity for the Tory and Labour Parties to sling mud at each other in a public relations exercise that shores up the perception of political difference between the two. At the same time, politicians used the Establishment’s main propaganda mouthpieces to continue to spew the myth that it is Britons who are lazy, shiftless, and scrounging.

In a study published by Employment Minister Chris Grayling and Immigration Minister Damian Green, statistics seemed to show that of 5.5 million people in the UK receiving working-age benefits (Income Support, Job Seeker’s Allowance, Carer’s Allowance and Disability Living Allowance), 371,000 had been foreign nationals when they first came to the country. More than half of those receiving a benefit had in fact at some point become British citizens. It is not clear how many over 50% is being referred to by the term “more than half”, but a conservative approximation shows that anything up to 180,000 benefit recipients are foreign nationals, receiving anything up to £1billion per year, and  who, if legislation matched what is lawful, need not be resident in the UK nor such a drain on the common wealth.

In the slanging match between Labour and the Conservatives, Labour immigration spokesman Chris Bryant seemed to accuse the Government of attempting to stigmatise all people who come the UK as immigrants.  Using the words “nasty” to describe the Tories, and daring still to insert the word “racist” into a discussion about immigration, Bryant engaged in some stigmatisation of his own – of  British people who cannot find work because of out of control immigration:

what the figures do show is that migrants into this country are more likely to be in work than British people.

However, it had been the Tories who had thrown the first accusations at Labour for its “scandalous omission” in failing to keep records of the nationality of benefit claimants while in government.

In a manner that must reflect the reception of such news-managed bickering in people nationwide, the comments section of the Mail Online (where the article appeared) was full of partisan arguments between readers who fail to see that they are being manipulated by both Labour and the Tories. The very purpose of such a story – even the way that the source information was presented - is to create emotional responses based on political affiliation, instead of allowing people to think rationally about an issue that is fundamentally altering the country.

Further evidence of the united effort of the Westminster Triumvirate (the LibLabCon) came in the form of Boris Johnson who, showing that hatred of British people is not confined to the Labour ranks, attacked Britons for being lazy on behalf of the Tories. Interviewed in the Sun, and seemingly aware that he was demonising British people (“I don’t want to stigmatise young people” he said),  Johnson had this to say:

we need to face up to these issues. In some cases it can come down to the fact that the jobs are there and people need to have the energy to go out and get them.

In all the talk by politicians designed to bamboozle the British public, and make them feel as though they deserve to be disinherited from their own birth right, there is the notable exception of a discussion about how most contemporary immigrants have no lawful right to live in the UK. They may be here legally because of a piece of legislation or an International Treaty, but because such things were implemented by criminal politicians intent on ruining the UK, and are therefore instruments of treason, many immigrants who are here because of them subsequently do not have the lawful right to be in the country.

With regards to the figures published by the Conservatives, of the 180,000-plus immigrants who became British citizens, it is not known how many of them came to be so through lawful means such as marriage, and lawful entry and naturalisation. People such as those who have gained British citizenship by outstaying the duration originally permitted to them, or by surreptitiously altering their status to win leave to remain (which may be what a nanny in David Cameron’s employ did), or those who originally came to the UK under EU legislation, all have won British citizenship unlawfully.

Just as in the USA with rampant immigration from Mexico, it is the design of the elite to economically and politically destroy Britain by importing huge numbers who have no loyalty to the host country, do not understand about labour rights or any customs of the host country, have no experience of a middle class and the expectations born of it, who will help cause national disintegration through ghettoisation, and will keep wages low for so as to create a situation that is most conducive for corporate profit making and control. The idea that British are lazy is a deliberate lie that is used to justify the mass influx of immigrants; if some Britons have become dependent on welfare it is because the British government has deliberately created that situation.

The immigration problem is one that can be reversed by deporting all unlawful immigrants, and cutting certain Britons off of welfare – therefore creating an impetus to work.

Mexican immigration causing US economic disaster

Mail Online article

Boris Johnson calls British lazy

David Cameron’s nanny’s dodgy visa