There was news this week that George Osborne thinks that there is very little that the British Government can do to stimulate the economy of the UK. There is only one hope, apparently, and that is to encourage businesses to flourish and hire more workers.

There is so much wrong with what I have just written, it’s hard to know where to begin. To get into it, though, let’s just start off by understanding that the national debt does not need to be paid off by throwing people out of public sector work who would otherwise support their local economies and the small businesses therein. There are monies, in the billions of pounds, which get sent out of the country in International Aid, illegal war, and EU and IMF contributions. In fact – although it might be too late to do it since the government has lately demolished our armed forces – the debt could be defaulted on (as part of a overarching programme of a restructuring of the welfare state and a withdrawal from the EU, with all the benefits that that entails).

On another tack, government could stop interfering with small business through the likes of Austerity (again) that hikes up rates, or through health and safety red tape. The government doesn’t need to stimulate business, it just needs to leave it alone; legislation is only really required to stop monopolisation, and to ensure that no one, whether it is a customer or employee, gets taken advantage of – defrauded, enslaved or unwillingly indentured if you like.

Then, of course, government could shut down the UK’s borders. It is not a hard thing to do; we live on an island. I think it is becoming quite obvious to anyone who hasn’t decided to be wilfully ignorant that if, in any economic scenario, the vast majority of jobs that are created go to immigrants, then this will push native-born people who can’t compete onto government welfare. This idea about being uncompetitive is very important. Britons are not uncompetitive through a lack of skills when it comes to slave-wage jobs – which are the kind of jobs that get created more often in our service-based economy. They are “uncompetitive” for two other reasons; they believe that they should have certain rights at work – which is a quality that corporations don’t like in them – and they can’t afford the cost of living to the standards they have become accustomed to. And I am not talking about wanting to buy a TV and video console; I am talking about people expecting to live in self-contained homes rather than communist-style open-plan apartments where you sleep in the bunk next to your neighbour. I have written before over again (here is an example) about how if we don’t change things, then Britons will have to accept a bitter and frugal existence in the future just in order to survive.

Also don’t forget those anecdotal cases where companies in Britain just don’t hire Britons because their human resources and management have been taken over by foreigners who want to employ their own people. In cases like these, there is no opportunity of being allowed to compete.

It’s not just immigrants taking work that is a problem in terms of the bloated welfare bill that is sinking the British economy. Working benefits are available for immigrants who are in work as well as unemployment benefits for those who are not, and we found out recently that this was costing the country quite a lot of money (see here also). I suspect that most working immigrants are on benefits because of the nature of the work that is available to them. Consider also the amount of money that immigrants send out of the country rather than spend it on a local economy. Immigrant labour means loss of income for small business.

So, what do we think is going to happen in the future when those jobs are created that George Osborne is apparently pinning his hopes on to boost the economy. If they are low wage ones, which they are more likely than not to be, then they will enable at least one immigrant to come to these shores and remain here. For every job created and filled by an immigrant (nearly nine out of ten), it means another Briton displaced who has to claim welfare. It means work-welfare for the immigrant who displaced him, and the very good chance of money disappearing for good out of the country. It also means an unknown quantity of other immigrants who are here for the chance of getting one of these new jobs, and while they wait, are able to claim benefits rather than return home (or later claim them even when they do).

All I can see for Osborne’s plan is the eventuality of a bigger bill for the welfare state. He’s ruled out borrowing, so through good ol’ Austerity, that means more public sector people out of work (and yet bigger welfare price tags), more taxes, and more wealth-stripping.

If the UK Government was the least bit interested in economic recovery then, in its primary role as a protector of the country from invasion (which it has abandoned), it should deport people who are here because of the accumulative EU treaties, which are instruments of treason. Right there is a singularly significant thing that it can do. But it won’t do that because the UK Government doesn’t want to rescue the British from the hell that they have lowered themselves into by being deceived by successive Progressive governments. The Government wants an environment that is destructive for individual wealth, because individual wealth, and the middle class where it resides in particular, presents a political challenge to a government that has aspirations of collectivising people irrevocably around the State in order to lock them into a totalitarian system.

British people need to be completely clear that they have been the victims of a design to impoverish them. It started a long time before, but we began to see the effects in the second term of the 1997 Blair Labour government. They borrowed to pay for an over-bloating welfare state which included too much public sector service, too much governmental bureaucracy and waste. By around 2005 I was commenting on the few blog sites I visited and making comparisons between NuLab and George Orwell’s IngSoc. I could see that the waste was deliberate in order to suppress the population. It didn’t occur to me at the time that, with Afghanistan and Iraq, we were also seeing the 1984-esque perpetual war for the same purpose.

At the time, and just as a result of experience, I also reasoned that the wrong people had got into positions of influence, and that it followed that they would fill their departments with their henchmen in order to overcome opposition. The Cultural Revolution was moving apace. Britain had been for a long time collectivised, but New Labour, the Third Way Marxist (Liberal Fascist) party, now implemented the quasi-religion of Equality. The big welfare state was an essential crucible, and the surrenderism, and subjective morality innate in the new conditioned collective attitude was important for getting people to tolerate the annihilation of their own perception of themselves as individuals with supremacy over the State. I seem to remember that Blair vowed to do away with conservatism; I expect many people, like myself, thought that it was a throw away line. He was talking about his Marxist revolution.

Eventually, according to all of our preconditioning, after plenty years of Labour, the Tory Party was going to clear up the mess that had been made. You will have noticed that concern for the national debt was stoked to fever pitch levels by the corporate media in the years immediately preceding the 2010 General Election. Nobody really understood that the Tory Party, under David Cameron and other modernisers like Daniel Hannan and Douglas Carswell, had completed the set, and had become Britain’s third Liberal Fascist party. When they got elected, the Progressive Tory Party (this is what they called themselves until they realised that we had cottoned on), the Tories didn’t do exactly what they were expected to do in terms of the EU, Human Rights, immigration, government waste, (and other areas you might care to mention). They didn’t do these things because they didn’t want to reverse the Marxist Cultural Revolution in the UK which gave them all the tools they needed, like their Labour colleagues in crime, for their class to misrule with impunity, nor with any threat to their hegemony. I am not talking about either the Tories or Labour guarding power jealously from each other, I am talking about how the entire political ruling class – the Westminster Triumvirate – makes sure that it stays in control. So, for instance, on gaining office the Tories definitely weren’t going to pull out of the EU because the EU means a guaranteed influx of (often feckless) immigration that displaces British people. Immigration is still climbing.

What they did do though, which has always been part of the long term plan, was to start dismantling the public sector, which you have paid for with your tax dollar, to make it viable for corporate takeover and profit; what to me seems tantamount to the liquidation of national asset nicely disguised as Austerity. (I’m not saying that dismantling the public sector is bad, but when you do it is crucial, as is who will be offering the services instead). Labour would have done the same if they had won the election. All the three main parties are bought by global banking interests, with the hubs of control sitting in the City of London and Wall Street.

It was also part of the plan to put people out of work and never to have them get back in, to make living costs more expensive (through the 20% VAT rate, specifically), and  to drive small company owners to the virtual soup-kitchen of welfare. It was all designed to render a once free people disempowered, hungry, vulnerable and easily controlled. Labour delivered Part One which involved putting a fat worm on the hook and having us bite it, the Tories, now delivering Part 2, are reeling us in.

So when George Osborne talks about all the money being spent while the country still had some, he is telling the truth for once. He is talking about your tax wealth being turned into debt and interest, which you are now paying back to Osborne’s banking fraternity with your freedom and livelihood. He’s admitting (without saying it) that the ruling class has stolen from you. He won’t admit to the other crimes (like this and this, for instance); all of those misdemeanours will have to come out in the Nuremburg-style tribunals that we must resolve to make happen after we have cleansed this country of the pernicious parasite, and all the rest of his vagabond ilk. It starts by voting them out of power.