The extent of Burgundy in 1477

It really is no wonder that, as part of the campaign to control the British through an education system that deliberately dumbs them down – an implementation of Marxism – history is not taught to an extent that would give people a power of political and moral discernment. If history was revealed in that way, it would show a pattern of human events that always involves a criminal class inventing the rules by which disadvantaged masses thereby have to live.

Even a superficial coverage of a large arc of history would show that those of us who grovel to the Queen of England do so only because her ancestors stole and murdered, and justified the acts with self-anointment. Until recently, the people who were our politicians and leaders were exactly so because their ancestors had at some point been licensed by the Crown to join in the exploitation. These days, that license is bestowed by voters in elections who are under the impression that they are exerting their democratic right – such is the craftiness and low cunning of our ruling class.

Moreover, a large arc of history would show how rare it is for men to organise themselves into a system that is truly conducive for justice and equal opportunity for all; conditions that can only come about by reigning in the criminal class, and denying them opportunities to murder, trick, conceal, deceive, and steal their way to power.

That Britons mostly have a diet of modern history is supposed (as far as I can guess) to reinforce the deception that there is no threat to British/English/Scottish national identity or there is no danger that the country could ever cease to be – that there never has been such a threat, and that there never will be one. This, of course, is entirely untrue, and the deceivers who promulgate the myth are like those who keep talking about Marxism as a threat that is before us that yet can be avoided; no, Marxism is very much the concept by which the country is governed.

A full history would show that there really have been hundreds of nations that have risen and fallen, annexed into foreign administrative spheres, their people killed, enslaved, subjugated, or simply bought off. The illusion of Britain as a perpetually unified and existent entity despite our inactivity to keep it that way must be assisted from the fact that ours is an island. Ignorance and shaped-perception are such an awesome combination that even when Britons are presented with maps detailing dissection of their country and rule from abroad, the bovine submission to the criminals with the carving knives is sustained.

I was reading the other day about the Burgundians. Who has heard of them? In 1467, the Duke of Burgundy, Charles the Bold, although nominally a vassal, was a rival to the King of France within the French territories. He inherited his dukedom, and regions in the Netherlands, and he swore to make them contiguous; to join together the land from the Swiss border to the North Sea. This is what he achieved in only a few short years, and in doing so created an effectively independent country and a European powerhouse that included the growing trading centres of the Netherlands. Naturally, the established criminals did not like their turf being stolen, and Burgundy was crushed between French and Swiss forces in the pay of Louis XI. The French territories went to France, and the Netherlands went to the Habsburg Empire.

As many a time as there are occasions in history when a country is purely overpowered, there are as more, I suspect, when a country destroys itself by its own enfeeblement. One scene that always sticks in my mind from one Hollywood-framed history lesson is from the film, from the days when movies were any good, about General George Custer starring Robert Shaw in the leading role. In this scene Shaw is lecturing a captured and high-powered Indian. He is telling him that it is the order of things that nations should be conquered, and that the Red Indian Nation had suffered on account of its being backward – imagine if you can such a scene featuring in a film these days!

Britain has become a backward nation. People might point to their iPad and scoff at such a claim, and in doing so inadvertently demonstrate their backwardness. Because having the collective ability to advance hinges on culture, and having the right kind of culture is dependent on choices, principles, and conducting oneself in a certain way; otherwise a society rots and the so-called icons of progress actually become devices that exacerbate the mouldiness. The proof of the pudding is always in the eating; the British are indeed being conquered by an invading army of foreigners who take their common wealth, and the globalist bankers and politicians who plotted to undermine the sovereignty of the British people.